How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 4: Text Structure

Explanation

Answer: B

PASSAGE

In ancient Egypt, the Nile River flooded every year. This left behind rich soil for farming. As a result, Egyptian civilization grew powerful.

Which choice best describes the text's logic?

A. Description of a desert.

B. Chain of cause and effect.✓ Correct

C. Argument against farming.

D. Comparison of two rivers.

Detailed Answer Explanation

This question tests your understanding of how the text is organized. Flood -> Soil -> Farming -> Powerful Civilization. Authors structure their writing purposefully to guide readers through their ideas. Identify the organizational pattern (cause-effect, compare-contrast, problem-solution) and how each part contributes to the whole. Authors choose organizational patterns deliberately to enhance their message. Recognizing whether a text uses chronological order, cause-effect, compare-contrast, or problem-solution helps you understand the author's purpose and follow the logic.

Key Evidence:

• "This left behind"

• "As a result"

Why others are wrong: A (River, not desert focus.), C (Farming helped them.), D (Only Nile.).

← Previous Next →