How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 5: Cross-Text Connections (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: B

PASSAGE

Text 1 Plate tectonics theory explains that Earth's outer shell is divided into several plates that glide over the mantle. Their movement causes earthquakes, volcanic activity, and mountain building. Text 2 The Himalayas were formed when the Indian Plate collided with the Eurasian Plate. Because both plates are continental crust and have similar density, neither subducted. Instead, they crumpled upwards, creating the highest peaks on Earth.

How does Text 2 illustrate the general process described in Text 1?

A. It describes volcanic activity.

B. It provides a specific example of mountain building resulting from plate collision.✓ Correct

C. It explains earthquakes.

D. It disproves plate tectonics.

Detailed Answer Explanation

This question asks you to compare perspectives from two passages. Text 1: Movement -> Mountain building. Text 2: Collision (Indian/Eurasian) -> Crumpled upwards -> Himalayas. Illustration. Understanding how the authors relate to each other's views is essential. Identify whether they agree, disagree, or address different aspects of the topic. Focus on their specific claims and conclusions. When comparing texts, first identify each author's thesis or main argument. Then determine how these positions interact: do they complement each other, contradict each other, or address different aspects of the same issue? The relationship between texts reveals deeper meaning.

Key Evidence:

• "mountain building"

• "collided with"

• "crumpled upwards"

• "creating ... peaks"

Why others are wrong: A (Mountain building.), C (Mountains.), D (Supports it.).

← Previous Next →