Set 5: Cross-Text Connections
Explanation
PASSAGE
Text 1 Meritocracy asserts that power should be vested in individuals almost exclusively based on ability and talent. It promises a fair society where anyone can rise to the top. Text 2 Critics argue that 'merit' is often defined by those in power to exclude others. Furthermore, without equal access to education, the talented poor cannot compete with the mediocre rich, making the system a myth.
What flaw in the meritocratic ideal does Text 2 point out?
Detailed Explanation
Text 1: Ideal (Based on ability/Fair). Text 2: Flaw (Unequal access/Defined by power). Conclusion: Structural inequality negates myth.
Key Evidence:
• "without equal access"
• "talented poor cannot compete"
Why others are wrong: B (Talented poor.), C (Mediocre rich.), D (Not mentioned.).