How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 4: Cross-Text Connections (Advanced)

Explanation

Answer: D

PASSAGE

Text 1 The digitization of historical archives has democratized access to primary sources. Documents once locked in dusty basements are now available to anyone with an internet connection. Text 2 However, digitization is selective. Funding priorities often dictate what gets scanned, leading to a 'digital canon' that reinforces existing biases while marginalized histories remain offline and invisible.

What caveat does Text 2 apply to the 'democratization' claimed in Text 1?

A. No one cares about history.

B. The internet is too slow.

C. digitization destroys papers.

D. Access is only expanded for selected materials, potentially distorting the historical record.✓ Correct

Detailed Answer Explanation

This question asks you to compare perspectives from two passages. Text 1: Democratized access. Text 2: Selective/Digital canon/Biases. Caveat: Democratization is partial and biased. Understanding how the authors relate to each other's views is essential. Identify whether they agree, disagree, or address different aspects of the topic. Focus on their specific claims and conclusions. When comparing texts, first identify each author's thesis or main argument. Then determine how these positions interact: do they complement each other, contradict each other, or address different aspects of the same issue? The relationship between texts reveals deeper meaning.

Key Evidence:

• "digitization is selective"

• "reinforces existing biases"

Why others are wrong: A (Not mentioned.), B (Not mentioned.), C (Not mentioned.).

← Previous Next →