How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 4: Cross-Text Connections (Advanced)

Explanation

Answer: B

PASSAGE

Text 1 Antibiotic resistance is driven by natural selection. When bacteria are exposed to drugs, the susceptible ones die, leaving behind those with mutations that allow them to survive. These survivors then multiply. Text 2 Horizontal gene transfer accelerates this process. Bacteria can swap genetic material, including resistance genes, with their neighbors. This means a harmless bacterium can acquire resistance from a dangerous one without waiting for a new mutation.

How does Text 2 amplify the threat described in Text 1?

A. It claims viruses are the problem.

B. It explains a mechanism (gene transfer) that spreads resistance much faster than vertical inheritance alone.✓ Correct

C. It proves antibiotics work perfectly.

D. It says bacteria cannot mutate.

Detailed Answer Explanation

This question asks you to compare perspectives from two passages. Text 1: Selection/Mutation (Vertical). Text 2: Swap genes (Horizontal). Acceleration: Don't wait for mutation -> Faster spread. Understanding how the authors relate to each other's views is essential. Identify whether they agree, disagree, or address different aspects of the topic. Focus on their specific claims and conclusions. When comparing texts, first identify each author's thesis or main argument. Then determine how these positions interact: do they complement each other, contradict each other, or address different aspects of the same issue? The relationship between texts reveals deeper meaning.

Key Evidence:

• "accelerates this process"

• "without waiting for a new mutation"

Why others are wrong: A (Bacteria.), C (Resistance.), D (Text 1 says they do.).

← Previous Next →