Explanations: Set 4: Cross-Text Connections

How does Text 2 resolve the contradiction posed in Text 1?

What irony is described in the relationship between the two texts?

How does Miller's argument in Text 2 revise the definition in Text 1?

What distinction does Text 2 draw between the two forms of power?

How does Text 2 amplify the threat described in Text 1?

What caveat does Text 2 apply to the 'democratization' claimed in Text 1?

How does Text 2 expand on the function of the form described in Text 1?

How does Text 2 refute the pessimism of the theory in Text 1?

What problem with the mechanism in Text 1 drives the innovation described in Text 2?

How does Text 2 complicate the principle established in Text 1?