Set 3: Cross-Text Connections
Explanation
PASSAGE
Text 1 The Turing Test evaluates a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior indistinguishable from a human. If a human judge cannot tell if they are conversing with a human or a machine, the machine is said to have passed. Text 2 The Chinese Room argument refutes the Turing Test's validity as a measure of understanding. It demonstrates that a system can simulate intelligence (manipulating symbols according to rules) without having any actual consciousness or semantic intent.
How does Text 2 undermine the criterion established in Text 1?
Detailed Explanation
Text 1: Passing = Indistinguishable behavior. Text 2: Simulating != Understanding (Chinese Room). Undermining: Performance vs Consciousness.
Key Evidence:
• "simulate intelligence"
• "without ... consciousness"
Why others are wrong: B (They can simulate.), C (Simulation.), D (Validity.).