Set 3: Cross-Text Connections
Explanation
PASSAGE
Text 1 Nudges are subtle design changes that alter behavior without forbidding options. For example, placing fruit at eye level in a cafeteria encourages healthy eating while still allowing people to choose junk food. Text 2 Critics call nudging 'soft paternalism.' They argue it is manipulative, bypassing rational deliberation to exploit psychological biases. Who decides what is a 'good' choice, and does this undermine autonomy?
What ethical concern does Text 2 raise about the methodology described in Text 1?
Detailed Explanation
Text 1: Nudge = Subtle/No ban. Text 2: Soft paternalism/Manipulative/Undermine autonomy. Concern: Manipulation/Freedom.
Key Evidence:
• "bypassing rational deliberation"
• "undermine autonomy"
Why others are wrong: B (No.), C (They work (exploit).), D (Text 1 says no ban.).