How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 7: Text Structure (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: A

PASSAGE

Recent studies show that quantum entanglement challenges our understanding of locality. If two particles are entangled, a change in one instantly affects the other, regardless of distance. Einstein derided this as 'spooky action at a distance,' yet experiments have repeatedly confirmed it.

Which choice best describes the function of the underlined sentence?

A. It introduces a historical skepticism that was later disproven by evidence.✓ Correct

B. It explains the mathematical formula for entanglement.

C. It supports the idea that locality is absolute.

D. It proves that the theory is scientifically impossible.

Detailed Answer Explanation

[Variation 1] This question tests your understanding of how the text is organized. Historical skepticism: Einstein's derision. Disproven: Experiments confirmed it. Authors structure their writing purposefully to guide readers through their ideas. Identify the organizational pattern (cause-effect, compare-contrast, problem-solution) and how each part contributes to the whole. Authors choose organizational patterns deliberately to enhance their message. Recognizing whether a text uses chronological order, cause-effect, compare-contrast, or problem-solution helps you understand the author's purpose and follow the logic.

Key Evidence:

• "Einstein derided"

• "yet experiments ... confirmed"

Why others are wrong: B (No math.), C (Refutes locality.), D (It was confirmed.).

🎉 Set Complete!

You've reviewed all explanations. Ready to try another set?

← Previous