How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 3: Text Structure (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: A

PASSAGE

The dialogue was sharp, a duel of wits rather than swords. Each word was parried with a clever retort, neither combatant willing to yield ground.

Which choice best describes the metaphor used in the text?

A. Conversation is compared to physical combat.✓ Correct

B. Arguments are compared to dancing.

C. Silence is compared to a weapon.

D. Words are compared to music.

Detailed Answer Explanation

This question tests your understanding of how the text is organized. Keywords: 'duel', 'swords', 'parried', 'combatant'. All combat metaphors. Authors structure their writing purposefully to guide readers through their ideas. Identify the organizational pattern (cause-effect, compare-contrast, problem-solution) and how each part contributes to the whole. Authors choose organizational patterns deliberately to enhance their message. Recognizing whether a text uses chronological order, cause-effect, compare-contrast, or problem-solution helps you understand the author's purpose and follow the logic.

Key Evidence:

• "duel of wits"

• "parried"

• "combatant"

Why others are wrong: B (Combat, not dance.), C (Dialogue, not silence.), D (No music.).

← Previous Next →