2

Set 3: Inferences (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: B

PASSAGE

A study of jury decision-making found that juries who took an early vote immediately after hearing evidence were more likely to reach quick unanimous verdicts. However, juries who discussed the case before voting showed more thorough consideration of minority viewpoints and alternative interpretations.

What can be inferred about jury deliberation processes?

A. Early voting always produces better outcomes.
B. Different deliberation structures may prioritize different values—efficiency versus thoroughness.✓ Correct
C. Minority viewpoints are irrelevant to jury decisions.
D. All juries reach unanimous decisions.

Detailed Explanation

Early vote = quick unanimity (efficiency); discussion first = thorough minority consideration—different tradeoffs.

Key Evidence:

• "quick unanimous verdicts"

• "more thorough consideration of minority viewpoints"

Why others are wrong: A (Thoroughness also matters.), C (Discussion groups considered minorities 'more thoroughly.'), D (Only early-vote juries were 'more likely' to reach unanimity.).

← PreviousNext →