Set 3: Inferences (Intermediate)
Explanation
PASSAGE
Astronomers studying exoplanets—planets orbiting stars other than our sun—have identified thousands of candidates. Most detection methods favor finding large planets close to their stars, leading to a catalog rich in 'hot Jupiters' but potentially underrepresenting Earth-like worlds in habitable zones.
What can be inferred about current exoplanet detection?
Detailed Explanation
Methods 'favor' certain types + 'underrepresenting' others = detection bias distorts our picture.
Key Evidence:
• "favor finding large planets close to their stars"
• "potentially underrepresenting Earth-like worlds"
Why others are wrong: A ('Underrepresenting' means inaccurate distribution.), C (Underrepresentation ≠ actual rarity.), D ('Hot Jupiters' are inhospitable.).