Set 2: Inferences (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: B

PASSAGE

The celebrated author never read reviews of his work. 'Praise makes me complacent,' he explained, 'and criticism paralyzes me. Both interfere with the only thing that matters—the next sentence.' His discipline became legendary, and he produced new novels at a steady pace until his death at age ninety-two.

What can be inferred about the author's creative philosophy?

A. He believed criticism always improved his writing.

B. He prioritized sustained productivity over engagement with critical reception.✓ Correct

C. He stopped writing after receiving negative reviews.

D. He valued external validation above all else.

Detailed Explanation

This question asks you to draw a logical conclusion from the text. Avoided reviews to focus on 'the next sentence'; produced steadily until 92—productivity over reception. A valid inference must be supported by evidence in the passage, even if not stated directly. Look for clues in the text that strongly suggest the answer. Avoid conclusions that require assumptions beyond what's written. Valid inferences are strongly supported by multiple pieces of evidence in the text. Be cautious of choices that go too far beyond what the passage actually states. The best inference is the one most directly supported by textual evidence.

Key Evidence:

• "the only thing that matters—the next sentence"

• "produced new novels at a steady pace"

Why others are wrong: A (Criticism 'paralyzes' him—harmful, not helpful.), C (He kept writing until death.), D (He avoided external feedback entirely.).

← Previous Next →