Set 1: Inferences
Explanation
PASSAGE
Psychologist Dr. Maya Patel studied children's reactions to unfamiliar foods. She found that children who were offered a new food alongside a familiar favorite were more likely to try it than children who were offered the new food alone.
What does the study suggest about encouraging children to try new foods?
Detailed Explanation
This question asks you to draw a logical conclusion from the text. The study directly found that children were 'more likely to try' new foods when paired with favorites. This implies pairing increases acceptance. A valid inference must be supported by evidence in the passage, even if not stated directly. Look for clues in the text that strongly suggest the answer. Avoid conclusions that require assumptions beyond what's written. Valid inferences are strongly supported by multiple pieces of evidence in the text. Be cautious of choices that go too far beyond what the passage actually states. The best inference is the one most directly supported by textual evidence.
Key Evidence:
• "new food alongside a familiar favorite"
• "more likely to try it"
Why others are wrong: B (The study shows different reactions in groups.), C (Force isn't mentioned; the study uses positive pairing.), D (The study is about how to serve them, not avoiding them.).