Set 2: Inferences (Advanced)
Explanation
PASSAGE
Anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss proposed that myths across cultures share underlying structural patterns—binary oppositions like nature/culture and raw/cooked—that reveal universal features of human cognition. Critics argue his approach imposes Western categories on diverse traditions and ignores the specific historical contexts that shape each myth's meaning.
What methodological tension does the passage describe?
Detailed Explanation
This question asks you to draw a logical conclusion from the text. 'Imposes Western categories' + 'ignores specific historical contexts' = universalism vs. cultural specificity. A valid inference must be supported by evidence in the passage, even if not stated directly. Look for clues in the text that strongly suggest the answer. Avoid conclusions that require assumptions beyond what's written. Valid inferences are strongly supported by multiple pieces of evidence in the text. Be cautious of choices that go too far beyond what the passage actually states. The best inference is the one most directly supported by textual evidence.
Key Evidence:
• "imposes Western categories"
• "ignores specific historical contexts"
Why others are wrong: A (Critics emphasize historical context.), C (Lévi-Strauss found patterns—the debate is about their validity.), D ('Critics argue' = disagreement.).