Set 1: Inferences (Advanced)
Explanation
PASSAGE
Postcolonial scholars have reexamined canonical works like 'Heart of Darkness,' arguing that Conrad's critique of colonialism is undermined by his dehumanizing portrayal of African characters. This debate illustrates a broader tension: whether a text's progressive intentions excuse—or are compromised by—its problematic representations.
What methodological challenge does the passage describe?
Detailed Explanation
This question asks you to draw a logical conclusion from the text. 'Progressive intentions' vs. 'problematic representations' = balancing purpose against execution. A valid inference must be supported by evidence in the passage, even if not stated directly. Look for clues in the text that strongly suggest the answer. Avoid conclusions that require assumptions beyond what's written. Valid inferences are strongly supported by multiple pieces of evidence in the text. Be cautious of choices that go too far beyond what the passage actually states. The best inference is the one most directly supported by textual evidence.
Key Evidence:
• "critique of colonialism is undermined by his dehumanizing portrayal"
Why others are wrong: A (The passage discusses problems in canonical works.), B (Representation matters beyond intent.), D (Scholars are 'reexamining,' not avoiding.).