How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 5: Cross-Text Connections (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: B

PASSAGE

Text 1 Keystone species are organisms that have a disproportionately large effect on their environment relative to their abundance. For example, sea otters keep sea urchin populations in check, preventing them from destroying kelp forests. Text 2 The removal of a keystone species can lead to a 'trophic cascade.' Without otters, urchins multiply, consume all the kelp, and destroy the habitat for countless other species. The ecosystem collapses from the top down.

Based on the texts, what is the consequence of removing a keystone species?

A. Kelp forests grow larger.

B. It triggers a chain reaction that destabilizes the entire ecosystem.✓ Correct

C. Sea urchins die out.

D. The ecosystem improves.

Detailed Answer Explanation

This question asks you to compare perspectives from two passages. Text 1: Keystone exerts large effect (Otters -> Urchins -> Kelp). Text 2: Removal = Trophic cascade/Collapse. Consequence: Destabilization. Understanding how the authors relate to each other's views is essential. Identify whether they agree, disagree, or address different aspects of the topic. Focus on their specific claims and conclusions. When comparing texts, first identify each author's thesis or main argument. Then determine how these positions interact: do they complement each other, contradict each other, or address different aspects of the same issue? The relationship between texts reveals deeper meaning.

Key Evidence:

• "trophic cascade"

• "ecosystem collapses"

• "destroy the habitat"

Why others are wrong: A (Destroyed.), C (Multiply.), D (Collapses.).