How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 5: Cross-Text Connections (Advanced)

Explanation

Answer: D

PASSAGE

Text 1 Broken Windows Theory suggests that visible signs of disorder, like vandalism, encourage further crime. It advocates for strict policing of minor offenses to prevent serious ones. Text 2 Critics argue that this approach leads to aggressive over-policing of minority communities. By criminalizing poverty and minor infractions, it destroys community trust and can actually increase crime rates by alienating the population.

What negative externality of the theory does Text 2 highlight?

A. More windows.

B. Less crime.

C. Clean streets.

D. The erosion of community trust and social equity due to discriminatory enforcement.✓ Correct

Detailed Answer Explanation

This question asks you to compare perspectives from two passages. Text 1: Police minor offenses. Text 2: Over-policing/Alienation/Destroys trust. Externality: Social harm. Understanding how the authors relate to each other's views is essential. Identify whether they agree, disagree, or address different aspects of the topic. Focus on their specific claims and conclusions. When comparing texts, first identify each author's thesis or main argument. Then determine how these positions interact: do they complement each other, contradict each other, or address different aspects of the same issue? The relationship between texts reveals deeper meaning.

Key Evidence:

• "destroys community trust"

• "alienating the population"

Why others are wrong: A (Irrelevant.), B (Goal.), C (Goal.).

← Previous Next →