Set 2: Command of Evidence (Intermediate)
Explanation
PASSAGE
The 'mere exposure effect' shows that people prefer familiar stimuli. A study found that students rated abstract shapes more positively after seeing them multiple times. Researchers suggest this has evolutionary roots: familiar things are safer than unknown ones.
Which finding would weaken the evolutionary explanation?
Detailed Explanation
The evolutionary explanation is 'familiar = safer. ' If people from unpredictable (potentially dangerous) environments don't show the effect, it suggests the mechanism isn't universal/innate evolutionary.
Key Evidence:
• "familiar things are safer than unknown ones"
Why others are wrong: A (Early appearance would support, not weaken, evolutionary origins.), B (Modality limitations don't directly contradict evolutionary basis.), D (Cross-cultural presence would support evolutionary/universal explanation.).