How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 4: Transitions (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: D

PASSAGE

Researchers have observed that antibiotic resistance has become a major public health threat as bacteria evolve to survive treatments. Overuse of antibiotics in both medicine and agriculture accelerates this process. _______ some infections that were once easily treatable are now potentially fatal.

Which choice completes the text with the most logical transition?

A. Similarly,

B. For instance,

C. Nevertheless,

D. Accordingly,✓ Correct

Detailed Answer Explanation

[Variation 3] This question asks you to choose the transition that best connects two ideas. Resistance increases (cause) → treatable infections become fatal (consequence). 'Accordingly' shows this logical consequence. Transitions signal the relationship between sentences or paragraphs. Determine the logical relationship (addition, contrast, cause-effect, example) and select the transition that accurately expresses it. The right transition makes the relationship between ideas crystal clear. Consider what logical connection exists: Is the second idea adding to the first? Contrasting it? Showing a result? The transition should accurately reflect this relationship.

Key Evidence:

• "antibiotic resistance has become a major public health threat"

• "potentially fatal"

Why others are wrong: A (Comparison - this is a consequence, not a similar point.), B (Example - while examples exist, 'Accordingly' better shows the logical progression.), C (Contrast - fatal infections confirm, not contradict, the threat.).

← Previous Next →