How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 10: Transitions (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: A

PASSAGE

Intriguingly, biodiversity loss threatens ecosystem services that humans depend upon—pollination, water purification, carbon sequestration. Species extinctions occur at rates far exceeding the natural background rate. _______ some biologists argue we are witnessing the sixth mass extinction in Earth's history, the first caused by a single species.

Which choice completes the text with the most logical transition?

A. In light of this evidence,✓ Correct

B. For example,

C. Meanwhile,

D. That said,

Detailed Answer Explanation

[Variation 2] This question asks you to choose the transition that best connects two ideas. The elevated extinction rates lead biologists to conclude we're in a mass extinction. 'In light of this evidence' shows how the data supports the conclusion. Transitions signal the relationship between sentences or paragraphs. Determine the logical relationship (addition, contrast, cause-effect, example) and select the transition that accurately expresses it. The right transition makes the relationship between ideas crystal clear. Consider what logical connection exists: Is the second idea adding to the first? Contrasting it? Showing a result? The transition should accurately reflect this relationship.

Key Evidence:

• "extinctions occur at rates far exceeding"

• "witnessing the sixth mass extinction"

Why others are wrong: D (Qualification - this continues the argument, not qualifies it.), C (Concurrent events - this is reasoning from evidence, not a parallel event.), B (Example - the mass extinction claim is a conclusion, not an example of extinction rates.).

🎉 Set Complete!

You've reviewed all explanations. Ready to try another set?

← Previous