How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 4: Transitions

Explanation

Answer: C

PASSAGE

The Roman Empire lasted for over 1,000 years. _______ it eventually fell in 476 AD.

Which choice completes the text with the most logical transition?

A. Therefore,

B. For example,

C. However,✓ Correct

D. Moreover,

Detailed Answer Explanation

This question asks you to choose the transition that best connects two ideas. 'However' signals the contrast: despite lasting so long, it eventually fell. Transitions signal the relationship between sentences or paragraphs. Determine the logical relationship (addition, contrast, cause-effect, example) and select the transition that accurately expresses it. The right transition makes the relationship between ideas crystal clear. Consider what logical connection exists: Is the second idea adding to the first? Contrasting it? Showing a result? The transition should accurately reflect this relationship.

Key Evidence:

• "lasted for over 1,000 years"

• "eventually fell"

Why others are wrong: A ('Therefore' shows result, but falling isn't expected from lasting long.), B ('For example' gives examples, but this is contrast.), D ('Moreover' adds information, but this is contrast.).

← Previous Next →