How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 3: Transitions

Explanation

Answer: C

PASSAGE

Intriguingly, the Titanic was considered unsinkable. _______ it sank on its first voyage in 1912.

Which choice completes the text with the most logical transition?

A. Therefore,

B. Similarly,

C. Yet,✓ Correct

D. In addition,

Detailed Answer Explanation

[Variation 2] This question asks you to choose the transition that best connects two ideas. 'Yet' signals the unexpected contrast: it was considered unsinkable but sank. Transitions signal the relationship between sentences or paragraphs. Determine the logical relationship (addition, contrast, cause-effect, example) and select the transition that accurately expresses it. The right transition makes the relationship between ideas crystal clear. Consider what logical connection exists: Is the second idea adding to the first? Contrasting it? Showing a result? The transition should accurately reflect this relationship.

Key Evidence:

• "considered unsinkable"

• "it sank"

Why others are wrong: A ('Therefore' shows result, but sinking wasn't expected.), B ('Similarly' shows comparison, but this is contrast.), D ('In addition' adds information, but this is contrast.).

← Previous Next →