How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 16: Rhetorical Synthesis

Explanation

Answer: B

PASSAGE

Researchers have observed that a student is writing about Great Wall. The student wants to highlight impressive scale. Notes: - Construction began in 7th century BC - Stretches approximately 13,170 miles - Millions of workers contributed - Built for military defense

Which choice most effectively uses information from the notes to accomplish the student's goal?

A. The fact that "Millions of workers contributed" accomplishes the student's goal.

B. The data showing "Stretches approximately 13,170 miles" most directly supports the goal to highlight impressive scale.✓ Correct

C. The fact that "Built for military defense" accomplishes the student's goal.

D. The fact that "Construction began in 7th century BC" accomplishes the student's goal.

Detailed Answer Explanation

[Variation 3] The goal is to highlight impressive scale. The note "Stretches approximately 13,170 miles" most directly addresses this goal.

Key Evidence:

• "Stretches approximately 13,170 miles"

Why others are wrong: A (This option focuses on a different aspect and doesn't directly address the goal to highlight impressive scale.), C (This option focuses on a different aspect and doesn't directly address the goal to highlight impressive scale.), D (This option focuses on a different aspect and doesn't directly address the goal to highlight impressive scale.).

← Previous Next →