Set 6: Rhetorical Synthesis (Advanced)
Explanation
PASSAGE
A student is writing about epistemic bubbles and echo chambers. The student wants to distinguish between these concepts and their different effects on discourse. Notes: - Epistemic bubbles passively exclude other viewpoints. - Echo chambers actively discredit outside sources. - Bubbles can be corrected by exposure to other perspectives. - Chambers resist correction because alternative sources are distrusted.
Which choice most effectively uses information from the notes to accomplish the student's goal?
Detailed Answer Explanation
This question asks you to effectively combine information to achieve a goal. The goal is to DISTINGUISH concepts and their effects. Passive exclusion/correctable (bubble) vs. active discrediting/resistant (chamber). The correct synthesis will use relevant details from the notes in a logical, purposeful way. Focus on what the question asks you to accomplish, then choose the answer that best achieves that goal using the provided information. Effective synthesis requires selecting and combining the most relevant information to achieve a specific purpose. Not all provided notes may be equally useful. Focus on what best accomplishes the stated goal while maintaining logical coherence.
Key Evidence:
• "distinguish between these concepts and their different effects"
• "Epistemic bubbles passively exclude"
• "Echo chambers actively discredit"
• "Bubbles can be corrected"
• "Chambers resist correction"
Why others are wrong: D (Notes confirmation bias but doesn't distinguish concepts.), A (Not in notes; general statement about misinformation.), C (Not in notes; discusses algorithms, not the distinction.).
🎯 Keep Practicing!
Master all sections for your best SAT score