3

Set 2: Inferences (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: A

PASSAGE

The Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I, imposed harsh reparations on Germany, including massive financial payments and territorial losses. While Allied leaders celebrated the treaty as a foundation for lasting peace, some contemporary observers warned that such punitive terms would foster German resentment and instability.

What does the passage imply about the Treaty of Versailles?

A. Its intentions and likely consequences were debated even contemporaneously.✓ Correct
B. Germany benefited significantly from its terms.
C. The treaty had no long-term historical significance.
D. It was universally praised at the time.

Detailed Explanation

This question asks you to draw a logical conclusion from the text. Allied leaders celebrated it, but 'contemporary observers warned' of resentment—debate existed at the time. A valid inference must be supported by evidence in the passage, even if not stated directly. Look for clues in the text that strongly suggest the answer. Avoid conclusions that require assumptions beyond what's written. Valid inferences are strongly supported by multiple pieces of evidence in the text. Be cautious of choices that go too far beyond what the passage actually states. The best inference is the one most directly supported by textual evidence.

Key Evidence:

• "celebrated as foundation for lasting peace"

• "warned that punitive terms would foster resentment"

Why others are wrong: B ('Harsh reparations' and 'territorial losses' = harm.), C (Warnings about instability suggest long-term importance.), D (Some 'warned' against it.).