Set 2: Inferences (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: C

PASSAGE

The pianist played flawlessly, each note precisely where it belonged, every dynamic marking observed. The audience applauded politely. Later that evening, a young student performed the same piece with several small errors but with a passion that left listeners visibly moved, some wiping tears from their eyes.

What can be inferred about the relationship between technical skill and emotional impact?

A. Professional musicians always receive standing ovations.

B. The audience couldn't tell the difference between the two performances.

C. Emotional expressiveness may resonate more deeply than technical precision alone.✓ Correct

D. Technical perfection guarantees emotional connection with audiences.

Detailed Explanation

This question asks you to draw a logical conclusion from the text. Flawless = polite applause; flawed but passionate = tears. Emotional delivery outweighed technical perfection. A valid inference must be supported by evidence in the passage, even if not stated directly. Look for clues in the text that strongly suggest the answer. Avoid conclusions that require assumptions beyond what's written. Valid inferences are strongly supported by multiple pieces of evidence in the text. Be cautious of choices that go too far beyond what the passage actually states. The best inference is the one most directly supported by textual evidence.

Key Evidence:

• "politely applauded"

• "left listeners visibly moved"

Why others are wrong: A (Ovations aren't mentioned.), B (Tears vs. polite clapping = clear difference.), D (Technical perfection got only 'polite' applause.).