Set 1: Inferences
Explanation
PASSAGE
A study of urban neighborhoods found that areas with more trees and green spaces had significantly lower rates of reported stress among residents. Interestingly, the effect was most pronounced among residents with the lowest incomes, who typically had fewer opportunities to travel to parks outside their neighborhoods.
What can be inferred from the study's findings?
Detailed Explanation
This question asks you to draw a logical conclusion from the text. The effect was 'most pronounced' for low-income residents who had 'fewer opportunities' for outside parks. This implies local greenery matters more when you can't access distant parks. A valid inference must be supported by evidence in the passage, even if not stated directly. Look for clues in the text that strongly suggest the answer. Avoid conclusions that require assumptions beyond what's written. Valid inferences are strongly supported by multiple pieces of evidence in the text. Be cautious of choices that go too far beyond what the passage actually states. The best inference is the one most directly supported by textual evidence.
Key Evidence:
• "most pronounced among residents with the lowest incomes"
• "fewer opportunities to travel to parks"
Why others are wrong: A (Trees reduced stress—eliminating them contradicts this.), C (Low-income groups benefited most, not least.), D (Income affects 'opportunities to travel to parks.').
🎉 Set Complete!
You've reviewed all explanations. Ready to try another set?