How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 3: Cross-Text Connections (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: B

PASSAGE

Recent studies show that text 1 Direct democracy allows citizens to vote on every law. This ensures that the will of the people is directly reflected in legislation. Text 2 However, direct democracy breeds inefficiency in large populations. It is impossible for every citizen to be informed on every issue, leading to poor decision-making or gridlock.

What practical obstacle does Text 2 present to the ideal in Text 1?

A. Laws are illegal.

B. The scale and complexity of governance in large societies makes universal direct participation unfeasible.✓ Correct

C. People do not want to vote.

D. Politicians are corrupt.

Detailed Answer Explanation

[Variation 1] This question asks you to compare perspectives from two passages. Text 1: Ideal (Will of people/Vote on every law). Text 2: Obstacle (Inefficiency/Large populations/Information overload). Understanding how the authors relate to each other's views is essential. Identify whether they agree, disagree, or address different aspects of the topic. Focus on their specific claims and conclusions. When comparing texts, first identify each author's thesis or main argument. Then determine how these positions interact: do they complement each other, contradict each other, or address different aspects of the same issue? The relationship between texts reveals deeper meaning.

Key Evidence:

• "breeds inefficiency"

• "impossible ... to be informed"

Why others are wrong: A (No.), C (Not mentioned.), D (Focus on system.).

← Previous Next →