How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 3: Cross-Text Connections (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: B

PASSAGE

Text 1 The search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) focuses on detecting radio signals from other civilizations. Proponents argue that radio waves are the most efficient way to communicate across interstellar distances. Text 2 Critics argue that an alien civilization might use a technology we haven't discovered yet, or one we stopped using, like lasers. Relying solely on radio waves might be like trying to detect a smartphone signal with a telegraph.

Which choice best describes the limitation of SETI presented in Text 2?

A. Aliens do not exist.

B. It is anthropocentric, assuming aliens use the same technology we currently prefer.✓ Correct

C. It is too expensive.

D. Radio waves cannot travel in space.

Detailed Answer Explanation

This question asks you to compare perspectives from two passages. Text 1: Use radio. Text 2: Aliens might use different tech (lasers, or unknown). Limitation: Anthropocentric assumption (Telegraph analogy). Understanding how the authors relate to each other's views is essential. Identify whether they agree, disagree, or address different aspects of the topic. Focus on their specific claims and conclusions. When comparing texts, first identify each author's thesis or main argument. Then determine how these positions interact: do they complement each other, contradict each other, or address different aspects of the same issue? The relationship between texts reveals deeper meaning.

Key Evidence:

• "technology we haven't discovered"

• "like trying to detect ... with a telegraph"

Why others are wrong: A (Assumes they do.), C (Not mentioned.), D (They can.).