How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 2: Cross-Text Connections (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: C

PASSAGE

Text 1 The greenhouse effect is a natural process. Gases in the atmosphere trap heat from the sun, keeping the Earth warm enough to support life. Text 2 Human activities, such as burning fossil fuels, have increased the concentration of these gases. This 'enhanced' greenhouse effect is trapping too much heat, causing global temperatures to rise dangerously.

How does Text 2 distinguish the current situation from the process described in Text 1?

A. It says the Earth is getting colder.

B. It claims that plants caus the warming.

C. It shifts from a necessary natural phenomenon to a harmful human-induced excess.✓ Correct

D. It argues that the greenhouse effect is a myth.

Detailed Answer Explanation

This question asks you to compare perspectives from two passages. Text 1: Natural/Support life. Text 2: Human-induced/Too much heat/Dangerous. Distinction: Natural vs Excessive/Harmful. Understanding how the authors relate to each other's views is essential. Identify whether they agree, disagree, or address different aspects of the topic. Focus on their specific claims and conclusions. When comparing texts, first identify each author's thesis or main argument. Then determine how these positions interact: do they complement each other, contradict each other, or address different aspects of the same issue? The relationship between texts reveals deeper meaning.

Key Evidence:

• "natural process"

• "Human activities"

• "trapping too much heat"

Why others are wrong: A (Rise.), B (Fossil fuels.), D (Confirms it.).

← Previous Next →