How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 1: Cross-Text Connections (Intermediate)

Explanation

Answer: B

PASSAGE

Text 1 Antibiotics are drugs used to treat bacterial infections. They work by killing bacteria or stopping them from reproducing. They have saved millions of lives since their discovery. Text 2 Overuse of antibiotics has led to antibiotic resistance. Bacteria evolve to survive the drugs, creating 'superbugs' that are difficult or impossible to treat.

Based on the texts, what acts as a limiting factor to the long-term effectiveness of antibiotics?

A. The fact that they kill viruses instead of bacteria.

B. The evolutionary adaptation of bacteria due to overuse of the medication.✓ Correct

C. The high cost of manufacturing the drugs.

D. Patients refusing to take them.

Detailed Answer Explanation

This question asks you to compare perspectives from two passages. Text 1: Effective/Saves lives. Text 2: Overuse -> Resistance/Evolution -> Ineffective. Limiting factor: Evolution. Understanding how the authors relate to each other's views is essential. Identify whether they agree, disagree, or address different aspects of the topic. Focus on their specific claims and conclusions. When comparing texts, first identify each author's thesis or main argument. Then determine how these positions interact: do they complement each other, contradict each other, or address different aspects of the same issue? The relationship between texts reveals deeper meaning.

Key Evidence:

• "evolve to survive"

• "overuse"

• "creating 'superbugs'"

Why others are wrong: A (Treat bacteria.), C (Not mentioned.), D (Not mentioned.).

← Previous Next →