Set 6: Cross-Text Connections
Explanation
PASSAGE
Text 1 Meritocracy asserts that power should be vested in individuals almost exclusively based on ability and talent. It promises a fair society where anyone can rise to the top. Text 2 Critics argue that 'merit' is often defined by those in power to exclude others. Furthermore, without equal access to education, the talented poor cannot compete with the mediocre rich, making the system a myth.
What flaw in the meritocratic ideal does Text 2 point out?
Detailed Answer Explanation
This question asks you to compare perspectives from two passages. Text 1: Ideal (Based on ability/Fair). Text 2: Flaw (Unequal access/Defined by power). Conclusion: Structural inequality negates myth. Understanding how the authors relate to each other's views is essential. Identify whether they agree, disagree, or address different aspects of the topic. Focus on their specific claims and conclusions. When comparing texts, first identify each author's thesis or main argument. Then determine how these positions interact: do they complement each other, contradict each other, or address different aspects of the same issue? The relationship between texts reveals deeper meaning.
Key Evidence:
• "without equal access"
• "talented poor cannot compete"
Why others are wrong: D (Mediocre rich.), C (Talented poor.), A (Not mentioned.).
🎯 Keep Practicing!
Master all sections for your best SAT score