Set 2: Cross-Text Connections
Explanation
PASSAGE
Text 1 The detective looked for clues. He found a footprint in the mud and a broken glass on the floor. He knew the thief had been careless. Text 2 The thief was actually very clever. He planted the footprint and the glass to trick the detective into looking the wrong way.
How does Text 2 challenge the detective's conclusion in Text 1?
Detailed Answer Explanation
This question asks you to compare perspectives from two passages. Text 1 Conclusion: Thief was careless. Text 2 Fact: Planted clues/Clever. Challenge: Not careless, but trickery. Understanding how the authors relate to each other's views is essential. Identify whether they agree, disagree, or address different aspects of the topic. Focus on their specific claims and conclusions. When comparing texts, first identify each author's thesis or main argument. Then determine how these positions interact: do they complement each other, contradict each other, or address different aspects of the same issue? The relationship between texts reveals deeper meaning.
Key Evidence:
• "thief had been careless"
• "thief was actually very clever"
• "planted to trick"
Why others are wrong: A (No.), B (Says he planted them.), D (Says 'planted ... the glass'.).