How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 5: Cross-Text Connections (Advanced)

Explanation

Answer: A

PASSAGE

Text 1 CRISPR is a revolutionary gene-editing tool that allows scientists to precisely cut and modify DNA. It holds the promise of curing genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis. Text 2 The ease and low cost of CRISPR raise bioethical concerns regarding 'germline editing'—changes made to embryos that are passed down to future generations. This could lead to 'designer babies' and irreversible alterations to the human gene pool.

What ethical dilemma does Text 2 introduce regarding the technology in Text 1?

A. The potential for eugenic applications and unintended long-term evolutionary consequences.✓ Correct

B. It is too expensive.

C. It only works on plants.

D. It does not work.

Detailed Answer Explanation

This question asks you to compare perspectives from two passages. Text 1: Cure diseases. Text 2: Germline editing/Passing down/Designer babies. Dilemma: Eugenic potential/Irreversible. Understanding how the authors relate to each other's views is essential. Identify whether they agree, disagree, or address different aspects of the topic. Focus on their specific claims and conclusions. When comparing texts, first identify each author's thesis or main argument. Then determine how these positions interact: do they complement each other, contradict each other, or address different aspects of the same issue? The relationship between texts reveals deeper meaning.

Key Evidence:

• "designer babies"

• "irreversible alterations"

• "gene pool"

Why others are wrong: B (Low cost.), C (Human gene pool.), D (Revolutionary.).

← Previous Next →