How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 16: Boundaries

Explanation

Answer: C

PASSAGE

Intriguingly, sarah wanted to visit the exhibition _______ she didn't have enough time.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A. ; but

B. : but

C. , but✓ Correct

D. but

Detailed Answer Explanation

[Variation 2] The correct answer is ', but' because of the rule: comma before coordinating conjunction joining independent clauses. When two independent clauses are joined by a coordinating conjunction (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so—FANBOYS), a comma must precede the conjunction. This creates a compound sentence with proper punctuation.

Key Evidence:

• "Sarah wanted to visit the exhibition _______ she didn't have..."

Why others are wrong: A ('; but' incorrectly uses a semicolon, which should not precede a coordinating conjunction), B (': but' incorrectly uses a colon, which is not used before coordinating conjunctions), D ('but' lacks the required comma before the coordinating conjunction).

← Previous Next →