How should I approach this reading question type?

First, identify the core claim of the text. Look for transition words like 'however' or 'furthermore' which signal changes in the author's logic. Then, match the evidence directly to the options provided.

What is the common trap in wrong answers for this category?

The most common trap is 'extreme language' (e.g., 'always', 'never') or 'unsupported inferences' that go beyond what is explicitly stated in the provided text snippet.

Why is the correct answer better than the close alternatives?

The correct answer usually captures the most direct and necessary evidence from the text, whereas alternatives often focus on minor details or distort the author's primary subject.

Set 1: Boundaries

Explanation

Answer: D

PASSAGE

The researchers concluded that the new treatment _______ effective in reducing symptoms by nearly 40 percent.

Which choice completes the text so that it conforms to the conventions of Standard English?

A. have been

B. were

C. are

D. was✓ Correct

Detailed Answer Explanation

This question tests your understanding of sentence boundaries and punctuation. The subject 'treatment' is singular, requiring singular 'was.' The past tense matches 'concluded.' To determine the correct answer, examine where complete thoughts begin and end. Look for independent clauses that need proper separation. A period, semicolon, or appropriate conjunction can correctly join or separate these ideas. When analyzing sentence boundaries, pay attention to how ideas flow from one sentence to the next. Correct punctuation ensures clarity and prevents confusion for readers. Review the options carefully to identify which choice creates proper sentence structure.

Key Evidence:

• "treatment (singular)"

• "concluded (past tense context)"

Why others are wrong: A ('Have been' is plural; doesn't match singular 'treatment.'), B ('Were' is plural; doesn't match singular 'treatment.'), C ('Are' is plural and present tense; neither matches.).

← Previous Next →