Text 1
Linguistic anthropologists once held that language evolution followed a linear trajectory from simplicity to complexity. This "accretion model" posited that early humans communicated with simple nouns and verbs, and over thousands of years, slowly developed complex grammar, tenses, and recursive structures. Under this view, the languages of ancient hunter-gatherers were functionally simpler than modern industrial languages.
Text 2
Recent comparative studies by linguist Dr. A. J. O’Connell challenge the accretion model. O’Connell points out that many ancient languages, such as Sanskrit or Classical Latin, possess grammatical structures far more intricate than their modern descendants. Furthermore, some indigenous languages spoken by isolated hunter-gatherer groups display levels of morphological complexity that baffle outsiders. This suggests that language does not simply "improve" linearly but fluctuates, often simplifying over time.