The following text is from a bioethics article.
Genetic enhancement of human embryos raises questions that therapy-oriented interventions do not. While treating disease commands near-universal endorsement, selecting for non-disease traits—height, intelligence, personality—generates profound disagreement. Some theorists embrace "liberal eugenics" permitting parental choice; others worry about justice, diversity, and the meaning of human giftedness. The debate engages fundamental values about human nature, equality, and the proper scope of technological intervention.
Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?
It distinguishes enhancement from therapy and presents ethical considerations on multiple sides.
It provides regulations governing genetic research across different countries.
It argues that all genetic enhancement should be prohibited.
It explains the molecular biology of gene editing techniques.
Correct Answer: A
Choice A is the best answer. The text distinguishes enhancement from therapy and presents both supportive (liberal eugenics) and concerned perspectives.
- Evidence: The text distinguishes: "Genetic enhancement... raises questions that therapy-oriented interventions do not." It presents support: "Some theorists embrace 'liberal eugenics'..." It presents concern: "others worry about justice, diversity..."
- Reasoning: The structure is Distinction -> Argument For -> Argument Against.
- Conclusion: This matches "distinguishes enhancement from therapy and presents ethical considerations."
💡 Strategy: Track the flow: Therapy is fine. Enhancement? Some say yes, some say no.
Choice B is incorrect because regulations aren't provided. Choice C is incorrect because multiple views are presented. Choice D is incorrect because molecular biology isn't discussed.