The following text discusses philosophy of action.
Davidson's causal theory holds that reasons explain actions by causing them. My desire for coffee and belief that the café is open cause my walking there. Critics argue this picture leaves mysterious how reasons as rational justifications can also be causes operating within natural causal chains. The tension between the "space of reasons" and the "space of causes" pervades contemporary action theory.
Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?
It presents a theory, identifies a critique, and locates a broader philosophical tension.
It provides step-by-step instructions for rational decision-making.
It compares Davidson's views with those of ancient philosophers.
It traces the neurological basis of intentional action.
Correct Answer: A
Choice A is the best answer. The text presents Davidson's causal theory, the critique (reasons vs. causes), and locates the broader tension pervading action theory.
- Evidence: The text presents the theory: "Davidson's causal theory holds that reasons explain actions by causing them." It notes critique: "Critics argue this picture leaves mysterious how reasons... can also be causes." It notes broader tension: "The tension between the 'space of reasons' and the 'space of causes' pervades..."
- Reasoning: The structure is Theory -> Critique -> Broader Context.
- Conclusion: This matches "presents a theory, identifies a critique, and locates a broader philosophical tension."
💡 Strategy: Track the flow: Reasons cause actions (Theory) -> But how? (Critique) -> Big problem (Tension).
Choice B is incorrect because instructions aren't given. Choice C is incorrect because ancients aren't compared. Choice D is incorrect because neurology isn't discussed.