The following text is from an anthropology article.
Gift-giving in many cultures serves functions beyond material exchange. Anthropologist Marcel Mauss argued that gifts create social obligations binding giver and receiver. The recipient incurs a debt that must eventually be repaid, establishing ongoing relationships. This perspective reveals gift economies as complex systems of social bonding rather than simple generosity.
Which choice best describes the function of the last sentence?
It introduces a new theory that contradicts Mauss.
It summarizes the broader significance of the analysis presented.
It provides specific examples of gift-giving practices.
It questions whether gift-giving truly creates obligations.
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the best answer. The last sentence draws a broader conclusion about what the analysis reveals—gift economies as complex social systems.
- Evidence: The sentence states: "This perspective reveals gift economies as complex systems of social bonding."
- Reasoning: It moves from the specific argument (Mauss) to a general summary of the concept's significance.
- Conclusion: The function is to summarize the broader significance.
đź’ˇ Strategy: Look for summary phrases like "This perspective reveals..." which indicate a concluding thought.
Choice A is incorrect because it supports, not contradicts, Mauss. Choice C is incorrect because no specific examples are given. Choice D is incorrect because obligations are affirmed, not questioned.