The following text discusses recycling programs.
Municipal recycling programs vary widely in their effectiveness. Some cities achieve recycling rates above 60%, while others struggle to reach 20%. The difference often depends on factors like curbside pickup availability, clear sorting guidelines, and public education campaigns. Successful programs typically combine convenient collection with community engagement.
What is the main purpose of the text?
To criticize cities with low recycling rates
To explain variations in recycling program success
To provide detailed instructions for sorting recyclables
To argue that all cities should adopt identical programs
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the best answer. The text explains why recycling rates differ (factors like pickup, guidelines, education) and what makes programs successful.
- Evidence: The text notes rates "vary widely." It lists factors: "curbside pickup," "guidelines," "education." It concludes with what "Successful programs" do.
- Reasoning: The text analyzes the reasons behind the variation in success.
- Conclusion: The purpose is to explain these variations.
💡 Strategy: Look for the cause-and-effect: Variation exists -> Here are the reasons why.
Choice A is incorrect because no cities are criticized. Choice C is incorrect because sorting instructions aren't provided. Choice D is incorrect because identical programs aren't advocated.