The following text discusses a new approach to language learning.
Traditional language classes focus heavily on grammar rules and vocabulary memorization. However, immersion-based methods prioritize conversational practice from the very first lesson. Proponents argue that this approach mimics how children naturally acquire their first language. Critics counter that adult learners benefit from explicit grammar instruction that children don't need.
Which choice best describes the overall structure of the text?
It traces the historical development of language teaching methods.
It presents two approaches and includes arguments for and against one of them.
It argues definitively that one teaching method is superior to another.
It explains the scientific basis for a single learning technique.
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the best answer. The text presents traditional methods and immersion methods, then includes both proponents' support and critics' objections to immersion.
- Evidence: The text contrasts "Traditional language classes" with "immersion-based methods." It then lists what "Proponents argue" (for immersion) and what "Critics counter" (against immersion).
- Reasoning: This structure presents two sides and evaluates one (immersion) through different perspectives.
- Conclusion: It fits the description of presenting approaches and arguments.
💡 Strategy: Track the shift in perspective: Method A -> Method B -> Arguments For B -> Arguments Against B.
Choice A is incorrect because no historical timeline is given. Choice C is incorrect because the text presents both sides neutrally. Choice D is incorrect because two methods, not one, are discussed.