George Orwell's essay 'Politics and the English Language' argues that vague, euphemistic language enables political deception. He demonstrates how phrases like 'pacification' disguise violent realities, and argues that clear, concrete language is necessary for honest political discourse. Critics note that Orwell sometimes uses the very techniques he condemns, and that his preferred 'plain' style also embodies political choices, making complete neutrality impossible.
The passage suggests that
achieving truly neutral language may be more difficult than Orwell acknowledged
Orwell supported the use of euphemisms in political writing
all critics agree with Orwell's conclusions about political language
'plain' style contains no political implications
Correct Answer: A
Choice A is the best answer. Even Orwell's 'plain' style embodies political choices.
- Context clues: Orwell sought neutral clarity; critics say his style also "embodies political choices."
- Meaning: If even the proposed solution isn't neutral, true neutrality may be unattainable.
- Verify: "Complete neutrality impossible" directly supports this inference.
💡 Strategy: When a proposed solution is shown to have the same problem it tries to solve, infer the problem is harder than claimed.
Choice B is incorrect because Orwell condemned euphemisms. Choice C is incorrect because critics are described disagreeing with aspects of his argument. Choice D is incorrect because critics note plain style "embodies political choices."