Organic farming typically produces 20-25% lower yields per acre than conventional farming using synthetic fertilizers and pesticides. However, organic farms require less energy input, produce less water pollution, and support greater biodiversity. A recent analysis found that when externalized costs such as environmental remediation are included, the true cost difference between organic and conventional produce narrows considerably.
It can be inferred from the text that
product price comparisons may not fully reflect the true costs of different production methods
organic farming is superior to conventional farming in every measurable way
conventional farming has no environmental impacts
yield per acre is the only important measure of agricultural success
Correct Answer: A
Choice A is the best answer. Hidden costs change the comparison between farming methods.
- Context clues: When "externalized costs" are included, the "true cost difference...narrows."
- Meaning: Conventional prices don't include environmental costs, making comparisons incomplete.
- Verify: Environmental remediation costs aren't in the price tag but are real costs.
💡 Strategy: When accounting for hidden factors changes an outcome, infer that visible measures are incomplete.
Choice B is incorrect because organic has "20-25% lower yields." Choice C is incorrect because the passage lists conventional farming's environmental impacts. Choice D is incorrect because multiple factors (energy, pollution, biodiversity) are considered.