When texting first became popular, educators worried that abbreviated language like 'brb' and 'lol' would degrade students' formal writing skills. Ten years of research has shown no such effect. In fact, heavy texters often demonstrate greater linguistic creativity and awareness of audience—they code-switch between formal and informal registers depending on context.
Based on the passage, it can be inferred that
all initial concerns about new technologies are unfounded
informal communication practices do not necessarily harm formal language skills
researchers support the use of texting abbreviations in formal essays
people who don't text have better writing skills
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the best answer. Texting didn't degrade formal writing and may have enhanced skills.
- Context clues: Research showed "no such effect" of skill degradation; texters show "greater linguistic creativity."
- Meaning: Informal and formal language skills can coexist or even reinforce each other.
- Verify: Code-switching ability shows texters understand both registers.
💡 Strategy: When research contradicts initial fears, infer the original concern was unfounded for that specific case.
Choice A is incorrect because this applies only to texting, not all technologies. Choice C is incorrect because the passage doesn't advocate mixing registers inappropriately. Choice D is incorrect because heavy texters showed greater creativity and awareness.