Text 1: Historian Dr. Sarah Wells reconstructs past mentalities. "Understanding historical actors requires grasping their worldviews," Wells writes. "We must interpret actions within the conceptual frameworks available to them."

Text 2: Historian Dr. David Park warns against anachronism's opposite. "Over-emphasis on difference risks making the past incomprehensible," Park cautions. "Historical actors shared basic human concerns. Some continuity enables understanding."

3
reading

What methodological balance do Wells and Park together suggest?

A

That historical research should be abandoned

B

That interpretation requires both sensitivity to difference and recognition of shared humanity

C

That past and present are identical

D

That conceptual frameworks never change

Correct Answer: B

Choice B is the correct answer. Wells emphasizes difference—grasping past worldviews. Park emphasizes continuity—shared concerns. Together they suggest balancing both to understand the past.

  1. Evidence: Wells: difference; Park: continuity.
  2. Reasoning: Both capture genuine aspects of historical interpretation.
  3. Conclusion: Good history balances difference and shared humanity.

Choice A is incorrect because both practice history. Choice C is incorrect because Wells emphasizes difference. Choice D is incorrect because Wells studies changed frameworks.