Text 1: Climate scientist Dr. Sarah Mitchell advocates immediate emissions cuts. "Every year of delay locks in more warming," Mitchell warns. "The carbon budget for 1.5°C is nearly exhausted. Action now prevents irreversible tipping points."
Text 2: Energy economist Dr. Robert Chang emphasizes transition costs. "Rapid decarbonization would devastate fossil-fuel-dependent communities," Chang observes. "Workers need retraining, regions need economic alternatives. Transition speed must balance climate urgency with just transition needs."
How does Chang's concern relate to Mitchell's urgency?
By denying climate change is occurring
By introducing social costs that might slow the transition Mitchell urges
By arguing that fossil fuels have no economic role
By claiming emissions have no climate effects
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the correct answer. Mitchell emphasizes speed. Chang introduces costs of speed—community devastation, worker displacement. Chang's concerns might slow the transition Mitchell advocates.
- Evidence: Chang: "Transition speed must balance" climate and social needs.
- Reasoning: Social justice considerations moderate urgency.
- Conclusion: Chang's human costs might slow Mitchell's timeline.
Choice A is incorrect because Chang accepts climate need. Choice C is incorrect because Chang emphasizes fossil fuel communities' dependence. Choice D is incorrect because Chang accepts decarbonization goals.