Text 1: Marine conservationist Dr. Emily Wong promotes marine reserves. "No-take zones allow fish populations to recover and spill over into surrounding waters," Wong writes. "Fully protected areas are the gold standard for marine conservation."
Text 2: Fisheries scientist Dr. Robert Chen studies management alternatives. "Marine reserves work in some contexts but not others," Chen observes. "In areas with high fish mobility, protected zones may not retain populations. Integrating sustainable fishing practices sometimes achieves better outcomes."
Based on the texts, how does Chen's view differ from Wong's advocacy?
Chen denies fish populations can recover at all
Chen argues context determines which conservation approaches work best
Chen opposes all marine conservation efforts
Chen believes fishing should be completely unrestricted
Correct Answer: B
Choice B is the correct answer. Wong promotes reserves as "gold standard." Chen argues effectiveness depends on context—fish mobility, local conditions. Different situations need different approaches.
- Evidence: Chen: reserves work "in some contexts but not others."
- Reasoning: Wong's universal standard doesn't fit all situations.
- Conclusion: Chen advocates context-sensitive approaches.
Choice A is incorrect because Chen doesn't deny recovery. Choice C is incorrect because Chen supports effective conservation. Choice D is incorrect because Chen mentions "sustainable fishing practices."