Text 1: Linguist Dr. Helen Zhao studies emoji communication. "Emojis add emotional nuance text alone cannot convey," Zhao writes. "These pictographs reduce misunderstandings by signaling tone and intent in digital messaging."
Text 2: Communication scholar Dr. David Park notes emoji ambiguity. "Emojis mean different things to different users," Park observes. "Age, culture, and platform affect interpretation. What seems friendly to one reader may seem sarcastic to another."
Based on the texts, how would Park likely assess Zhao's claims about emoji communication?
As accurate regarding intent but overconfident about consistent interpretation
As completely wrong about emoji usage
As applicable only to professional communication
As unrelated to digital messaging
Correct Answer: A
Choice A is the correct answer. Park doesn't deny emojis convey intent (Zhao's point) but questions consistent interpretation across users. Sender intent exists; reception varies.
- Evidence: Park: emojis "mean different things to different users."
- Reasoning: Zhao is right that emojis carry intent; Park adds interpretation varies.
- Conclusion: Intent is conveyed but not reliably understood.
Choice B is incorrect because Park doesn't completely reject Zhao. Choice C is incorrect because professional context isn't specified. Choice D is incorrect because both discuss digital messaging.